My Blog List

Thursday, 8 November 2012

Tutorial - Session 3

Census Returns 1871 to 1841

1871 Census

The 1871 Census was taken on Sunday 2 April 1871. This was the first census which recorded whether a person had a disability (imbecile, idiot or lunatic - not exactly politically correct by today's standards!).

Marks Family Tree

 



For Mark, this census proved to be particularly important. His great grandfather Ephraim was aged 11 and was living with his mother, Ellen and his siblings at The Fields, Rushmere St Andrew. His father appears to have died as his mother's marital status is widow. Ellen is supporting her 8 children although it appears that they may be supporting her, the eldest son living with her, James, is working as an Export Clothier's Porter, the eldest daughter, Eliza, is a Domestic Servant, although currently unemployed, Walter aged 18 is a Export Clothier's Warehouseman and Thomas, aged 14, and Ephraim aged 11 are Agricultural Labourers the remaining 3 aged 9, 7 and 4, are at school.

So, this census gives us Ephraim's mother's name and a year and place of birth, and the names of some, if not all, of his siblings - all this information can now be added to the family tree.

1861 Census

The 1861 Census was taken on Sunday 7 April 1861.  The information collected was the same as that collected in the 1851 Census.

Mark's Family Tree

Up until now, everything has been quite easy, however, after searching for Ephraim in the 1861 Census the four results which came up did not fit with the information we already had. The mother's and the sibling's names were all different, and the place was also incorrect.

We then repeated the search using his mother, Ellen's information; putting her details in the search engine instead of Ephraim.


Fantastic! We had found our family! They were living at Head From Home (very unusual!) in Rushmere, the same village as in the 1871 census, and all the details seemed correct - names and ages.  Ellen was married to Ephraim and the one year old son who we thought would be called Ephraim was actually called Ambrose! We now had the name of Ephraim's father, also Ephraim, his place and date of birth and another child. Ephraim's (senior) occupation was an Agricultural Labourer, and all the children were at school.

More information to add to the family tree.

1851 Census


The 1851 Census was taken on Sunday 31 March 1851.  There was far more information contained in this census compared to the previous census for 1841: relationship to head of household, marital status, place of birth, whether (blind, deaf or dumb) and this time the ages were not rounded up to the nearest 5 years.

Mark's Family Tree

Mark could no longer look for Ephraim, his great grandfather, since, in 1851 he had not been born.  The search now diverted to his father, Ephraim, born in 1823.  This information was input into the search engine of the website where he was searching for the census records.


Ephraim was found with Ellen at Rushmere House, Rushmere with their two children James aged 2 and Mary aged 2 months.

1841 Census

The 1841 census, taken on Sunday 6 June 1841, gives the least information of all the census returns.  Ages are rounded up to the nearest 5 years, except for children under 15. The occupation was included and whether they were born in the same county as they were this year, elsewhere in the country or in foreign parts.

Mark's Family Tree


Mark now had to search for his great grandfather Ephraim in Suffolk who was born around 1826. Mark had previously used + and - 2 years but on this occasion that brought nothing up.  He widened his search to 5 years + or - and a likely family was found.


Mark was lucky as Ephraim was not a common name, he was also lucky that Ephraim had not moved from the place he was born. Remember that the ages in the 1841 census are rounded up to the nearest 5 years for people under 15 and you can see here that Ephrain and his brother Nathan were both marked as being born in 1826.  To double check this, if you are unsure whether this would be your relative, you could look up the parents and siblings and make sure there is not another Ephraim living in the village or with his parents and siblings.  Mark found his great great grandfather and great great grandmother thereby taking his family back to around 1791 by using this census and was able to add this information to his family tree.

Mark decided that he would like to carry on with census data for all lines of his family to see how far he can get back.  After he has done this, we'll come back to filling in information on the relatives we have already found.

Mark has already found that he needs to combine census records with birth and marriage indexes in order to confirm surnames and dates of birth. This would be a sensible way to continue, rather then relying on just census records.

Conclusion Part 2 (carried on from Tutorial 2)

6. The 1841 census rounds up ages, so be sure to remember this when searching for your relatives.
7. Each form given to a householder when completed was then given to an enumerator who transcribed the details into government lists, these lists are the records we see as census returns. Therefore, if the original details were written carelessly this information could have been written incorrectly on the census returns.  The enumerator could also have made mistakes.
8. You can check on a family's movements by looking at the birthplaces of children and the dates they were born.
9. When using website's transcriptions, be sure to look at the originals in case mistakes were made when transcribing - this is quite common.



Monday, 5 November 2012

The Mob Goes Wild in Ipswich in 1867

Guy Fawkes Day in Ipswich, 1867

I came across this surprising article taken from the Ipswich Journal in 1867 when looking for something to add to my page on Facebook to mark the 5th of November, the day known for some as: Fireworks Day, Bonfire Day or Guy Fawkes Day:

This day of national commemoration, the observation of which which had actually been made an Act of Parliament in January 1605/06, called for a public thanksgiving for the failure of the plot to kill King James I, the Head of State. 

The article begins by reporting on the working class local community and their lack of producing quality 'Guys' to celebrate this National day.  The journalist reports that there were very few 'guys' and those that were made were poor quality.

"The few that appeared were of an unusually squalid character, and two 'guys' (in every sense of the word) on a donkey cart were the only ones which attracted any great amount of attention.  The 'guys' were made up in various forms. The attendants, however, were all agreed on one point - in wanting coppers - and if the public would but withhold their pence there would soon be an end to this stupid custom". 

I think the writer would be interested to know that only recently is this practise going out of our custom,  probably being due to the ever increasing popularity of Halloween just a few days prior.


The events happening within Great Britain as a whole should be addressed in order to understand the state of working class life in Ipswich and the events which followed at that time. The day originally marked as anti-Catholic (Guy Fawkes was a Catholic) over the years had taken on a new meaning.  It was regarded as a day where violence would erupt by the lower classes as a chance to 'pit disorder against order, a pretext for violence and uncontrolled revelry'. Due to this social unrest steps were taken by the authorities and The Anniversary Days Observance Act repealed the original 1606 Act to observe this day and the sale of fireworks was restricted.

Ipswich 1867 

 

Around his time there were various incidences of social unrest due to the increase in food prices, the most famous being the Swing Riots of 1830.  The people of Ipswich, it appears (like those in Exeter in the same evening) incensed by rising food prices and banned from firing their customary bonfires and fireworks, congregated at the Cornhill.

It should be noted that the better class of schools in Ipswich provided bonfires and fireworks for their boys whilst the poorer boys had to make do with letting off crackers and other fireworks in the streets (illegally!). Whether this was another reason for the later actions of the evening we do not know.

However, it appears that matters escalated during the evening.  The number of people congregating at the Cornhill grew to 500 at it's peak, the writer does not give any indication of events before, but retells the evening from the call of  'Now for Fison's Mill!'.

"Large numbers proceeded at great speed down Queen Street, St Nicholas Street, to Stoke Bridge, where they stationed themselves [at Fison's Mill] and commenced throwing stones at the windows".

Stoke Bridge from an old postcard


Apparently all through the day there were rumours that the mill would be attacked because of the increase in the price of flour but it was treated as an idle threat and nothing was done by the authorities in preparation.

Unfortunately, if this was an organised riot about food prices, the message the mob were trying to deliver fell on deaf ears, it was reported that:

"The roughs in all probability had no intention at first of making an onslaught upon the mill, but having congregated the rumour suggested the cry 'Now for the Mill' which was forthwith acted upon. The mob evidently had no defined purpose but that of doing mischief, for the damage was not confined to the mill."

The result of the actions of the mob that night were far less damaging than it could have been.  There were a few windows broken by the mob along the route to the Mill and about 50 windows were broken on the mill itself, mostly due to a new road being laid and missiles being readily available. The authorities were hampered by onlookers (wittingly or unwittingly) acting as a shield preventing the police from making many apprehensions. The next night, the reporter mentions a similar scene of events with a mob this time being thwarted by the local constabulary at the mill, who then made a cry, this time for the Convent. It appears that any damage done this day was also minimal.